Book Review: The Not-So-Great Gatsby


I’m probably one of the more avid readers that I know, devouring about a book a week in a good month. I recently decided that for every bestseller (read: brain junk food) I read, I needed to balance my mental diet with something a bit more substantial. If you consider "The Da Vinci Code" to neatly straddle the line between both worlds, please stop reading now.

In the literary morass that was my high school and college education, I read more than my fair share of “classics”. Some, it seemed to me, were far more deserving of that accolade than others. "The Grapes of Wrath", "To Kill a Mockingbird", and "Animal Farm" inspired me and made me think about and question my views of the world. On the other hand, "My Antonia" and "Red Badge of Courage" made me want to stab my eyes out by page 20.

Somehow, one “classic” novel managed to never pop up on any of my reading lists or syllabi: "The Great Gatsby". That’s right, someone as (supposedly) well-read as I am made it through primary and secondary education without reading F. Scott Fitzgerald’s great American novel. I’d heard of it, of course, and figured it was good in that same vague way you figure opera is awesome, compelling art but have no intention of ever seeing one. However, with my new resolve to work great literary pieces into my reading rotation, last week I proudly walked out of the local library with Fitzgerald’s thin tome tucked under my arm. I figured it would be a quick, enjoyable way to start on the road to intellectual pretentiousness. There was just one little hiccup, though.

It sucks. "The Great Gatsby" sucks. There's no getting around it. I HATED it. From its mind-numbingly dull beginning to its bizarre murder-suicide finale, there wasn’t a single drop of literary value to be had in its pages. I kept reading and reading and telling myself, “Surely something that justifies “classic” is going to pop up any time now.” Alas, it was not to be. Teachers and professors who rhapsodize about its merits and deep significance are liars. Deluded, deceived, deranged LIARS, I tell you! Literati who sing its praises and laud its profundity are fools. If the book hadn’t been the prized property of the Orem Public Library, I would have given its precious pages to my year-old nephew and let him have his way with it. Such is the fate an abomination like "The Great Gatsby" deserves.

With such a rocky start, I am now seriously rethinking my “classics” aspirations. Anyone have an extra copy of "Angels and Demons"?

21 comments:

Jen said...

I told you I would leave a comment and here it is...I cannot believe you don't like "My Antonia." Now "Great Gatsby" I can agree with you on that note.

Also, you need to go to the opera.

Rachel said...

Its good to see you're writing again! I've missed the wit of Mr. Shane.

Brock said...

You're back!!! I don't know how i've made it through these last 4 months. And yet, here i am safe and sound on the other side of it. Congrats for reading a classic. i tried that with Ulysses ("most influential book of our times" my foot. It's also crap, don't bother). Now Crime and Punishment is a long one, but ultimately it was interesting to read. I'd recommend that one for the classics list.

Melissa said...

Yay, Shane is writing again! I don't remember loathing Gatsby in high school like you apparently did, but nothing really stands out to me about it. I was thinking about skimming through some of those old high school classics, but your review may have convinced me otherwise.... :)

Unknown said...

I like the book. I don't understand why you hate it so much. Is it because it's not engaging? I love the book. Just finished it. Maybe it only relates to a small group since some people find it boring in my class...

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bob said...

you just put almost all my feelings about this book into words. A classic book should have a classic feel, such as 1984, and animal farm, both by one of the best authors, george orwell. I expect classics to have such affects on me, and the great gatsby was no more affecting on me than harry potter, or the lord of the rings!

Anonymous said...

Finally someone who sees through the guise of pretentious bullcrap. I couldn't stand the book. I was forced to read it in high school, and again now in college. It doesn't help that so many love it, it just me more vocally angry about how overrated it is. I was hoping for an eloquent and reasonable arguement more than "it sucks", and luckily for me there is one here.

Nick Jones said...

I had to read this god-awful story in high school. The only reason it's considered a classic is because it's the first time anyone came up with a cock-barf like this. It doesn't matter how early the book was written; it's a piece of shit. To make things worse, we had to do long and tedious assignments on it in my English class. I got so desperate that I actually switched out of the class, making up shit like "I need my English class as my last period." I'll admit that at some points, Gatsby wasn't that bad, but it certainly wasn't good. Furthermore, the symbolism is just crammed in there to compensate for how shitty the story actually is. The best part in the story is when Gatsby dies because Mr. Wilson thought he ran over his wife. By the way, if you haven't read the book yet, don't read that last sentence.

Nathan said...

I was considering writing a post like this, but now I don't have too. You summed up my thoughts perfectly. A horrible read.

Grey Fox said...

You're absolutely right. My Antonia and The Great Gatsby suck big ones. There are no points to them outside of taking cheap shots at puppy love and trying to dissect the meaning of Gatsby knocking over a clock. Who gives a fuck?

Unknown said...

I second your opinion! I recently read the Great Gag-me and have to agree! I blogged about it too and said that I would put the book in a pit of Greek fire! I am so glad that we agree!

Anonymous said...

THANK YOU! You wrapped up everything I had in mind about this book. It is just plain awful. I had to read this book for my AP English Lit. class, and after reading several chapters, I just wanted to stab this book with a knife and burn it. Even after finishing the book, my opinion hasn't changed about how much I hate it.

Anonymous said...

Thank you. I've read part of this and thought "this book truly sucks" and yet did not have the courage to say so to my literati friends.

Anonymous said...

I saw the movie when it came out in 1974 with Robert Redford. It wasn't very good and got bad reviews. I then read the book and felt that it was a pretty faithful presentation of the book. Therefore the book sucked. It still appears atop everyone's best list. What do they know? I have never read any Faulkner, other than a synopsis of "As I Lay Dying" and it seems like some really sick crap. He seems to be another one the literati feels is a genius. I'll wade through Crime and Punishment, the Count of Monte Cristo or Atlas Shrugged another time before I waste time reading what most of these Yahoos consider essential.

Anonymous said...

"To kill a moaning bird" and "A-hole farm" seriously suck,...but if you want a true self indulgent, narcisisstic suck fest then read the idiotic adventures of "Catcher in the rye".....baarf.

Anonymous said...

The point isnt character dynamic or excitement. It is to show us the moral decay of the roaring twenties. I believe it did just that. It showed us the shallowness and sin of the characters. The misplaced idea of the American dream.

Anonymous said...

Wow, this is so disappointing. To begin, you've set out here to provide a thorough demonstration of why you didn't like one of the seminal works of literature, yet all you can come up with is "Anyone who tells you it's good is LIAR"? Are you serious? You've clearly never read the book - and when I say read, I mean actual deep reading and consideration of the words - because your own use of language is shocking.
I think you've missed the point of the whole novel. The novel's beauty has absolutely nothing to do with the plot; completely unlike, as you cite, the books that you enjoy - "To Kill A Mockingbird" is a good example. No, Fitzgerald's strength is in his power of description, and his ability to construct a demonstration of the culture and the flaws of an entire age - consider the first party scene, for example, where synecdoche synesthesia build the incredible image of a swirling mass of bodies at the party, moving both in unison and it total discord to the frenzied music of the "Jazz Age". THIS is Fitzgerald's strength - it has nothing to do with how the plot progresses. Gatsby, the character, you've missed entirely; he is not simply a man, but an embodiment of the ideas that lie in the very heart of the American Dream, an embodiment of the capacity for infinite hope that defined the first dreams for the New Wold. He provides an exact opposite to the kind of "heroes" of the post-war Generation: Rockefeller, James Hill, Pickford; all men with a visage of wealth or vanity with no underlying substance. THIS is what Gatsby contradicts, and why the text is so fantastic. It is, above all, a social commentary, not a children's book. Don't read the plot: read deeper.

Seandrethegiant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dr. Ferris said...

The book is in reality a litmus test - it's checking to see if you're a limousine liberal or not. If you are, the book will resonate with you because it's about your world. In the same way Red Badge of Courage resonates with veterans, or with people who are familiar with military history. If you are not within the proper category, the book will be meaningless to you.

And of course, because limousine liberals are far more represented in academia than any other demographic, this awful book becomes a "classic". Natch'.

Unknown said...

The plot is about as good as the grandma got run over by a reindeer song.

Chapter 1 summary: Daisy is married to Tom
Chapter 2 summary: Tom has an affair with Myrtle
Chapter 3 summary: Gatsby is rich
Chapter 4 summary: Gatsby loves Daisy
Chapter 5 summary: Nothing!
Chapter 6 summary: Nothing!
Chapter 7 summary: Daisy runs over Myrtle
Chapter 8 summary: George, Myrtles husband kills Gatsby thinking that he killed Myrtle
Chapter 9 summary: Nobody cares that Gatsby died.

A bland detail filled story with an upsetting ending, annoying characters, and futile attempts to actually inspire readers through symbolism certainly describes the Great Gatsby.
This story might very well describe the 1920s but that does not give it the merit of classic because it fails to deepen that into a either a functional, and complex plot or an actually entertaining read. Frankly I do not give a crap what life in the 1920s were like and how the instruments at Gatsbys mansion worked or how the clothing the people wore were. It is a story I want to scream at to get to the point before recognizing that there actually is no point.